Essay On Rte

Lentin reflections

Producer/director Louis Lentin’s contribution to television drama was acknowledged with a Jacobs' Irish Critics' Award, his music programmes included opera and symphony concerts, while his documentaries, like 1996’s ‘Dear Daughter’, exposed Ireland’s shameful past. The former RTÉ Head of Drama (78), now writing his autobiography, looks back on a long and distinguished career.

“I’d been invited into RTÉ by Hilton Edwards (then RTÉ Head of Drama) to join an autonomous television drama department but the powers-that-be decided I needed some training first, so I became a floor manager. I was the floor manager on the very first Mass that went out from Studio Three on the opening night, which Archbishop John [Charles] McQuaid [celebrated]. It was quite an event to do. I thought this was rather strange seeing that the director of it, Chloe Gibson, was a convert to Catholicism and I’m Jewish.

“There were many programmes one handled as a floor manager and then I moved into directing the news, which was extremely good training. It was in the old Studio Three – I don’t think there’s a vestige of it remaining – and you directed and cut the news yourself with film and VT (video tape) flying in at you. It really taught you how to react. Anything could happen.

“‘Isles of Aran’ (RTÉ One, Tuesday 23 October, 11.15pm) was the first documentary I did, a long time ago (1963). I’d never been to the Aran Islands and thought wouldn’t it be interesting to do a programme on my first impressions. I went out totally inexperienced. In those days you were allotted a certain amount of film per week – about 1,500 feet. We saved up all our film allotment and went out and tried to come back with a story.

“A script had been promised to me by an Aran islander who worked in RTÉ but no script appeared. We took the boat across to the Aran Islands, shooting everything in sight. We did the three islands within a week, which was far too fast, and eventually a shape to the film became obvious to me.

“We had to get home because the film camera we were using was required for sports programmes on the Sunday. I wanted to go back and spend another week there to finish it but we weren’t allowed, so [the programme] going out is a travelogue. I learned the hard way to know what you wanted to do when you went out. None of this nonsense of we’ll shoot everything and then decide how we want to put it together. The more one went on the more one learned to spend thinking time on your programme before you did it, whatever it was.

“Then I moved onto drama. In those days you directed and produced yourself. It gave you that extra freedom. You related directly to the Head of Drama, who was, for a long time, Chloe Gibson. They were usually three-act plays, mostly stage plays put on screen. An act at a time was shot as live. You did two days in the studio for a sixty-minute play, three days for a ninety-minute. Halfway down the second day on a sixty-minute your two acts had been rehearsed and then you started to record them after tea. There was very little opportunity to edit in the early days. That became possible as time went on and made a hell of a difference.

“The first play I did was ‘Miss Julie’ by Strindberg; then I did ‘The King of Friday’s Men’, by M J Molloy, which is a great, big Abbey play. In later years I did a lot of classics like ‘Uncle Vanya’, and ‘King of the Castle’ by Eugene McCabe. We did one called ‘One for the Grave’ by Louis MacNeice, very much a stage play. We needed audience participation for that one – people to come in and sing a song. We handed out the lyrics and did a quick rehearsal with them and that was recorded as live.

“Editing became more sophisticated. Nowhere near like what it is now but much easier. There were times when video tape was edited with a razor blade on an old cutting block. Some of the video editors were doing incredibly sophisticated work using very crude tools.

“If a television director now was to look at it they’d say ‘My God, could they do that in those days?’. It wasn’t sophisticated by any means, there wasn’t smooth mixing of sound from scene to scene as you can do now but it was sincere.

“Then we were ousted from the studio. We had five days on location with bloody great big cameras those days and then you came back and edited. When we did ‘Insurrection’ for example in ‘65/’66, I had two days in the studio each week and then Michael Garvey shot pieces on film and I shot VT. We were given a lot of equipment. The importance of the programme was realised from the beginning. Gunnar Rugheimer, who was controller at the time, was incredibly cooperative.

“To a great extent, directors and producers didn’t care about audience ratings. The choice of play was not dominated by that. Alright, so we were dependent on an awful lot of stage plays but they were liberally sprinkled with new plays for television as well. We were trying to move into social drama.

“When I became Head of Drama in ’78 I tried to get as many plays dealing with the man next door shown. We managed to get out two consecutive seasons of 16 plays; some bought in, some repeats but the majority of them productions done there and then. That was called ‘Thursday Play Date’ and then we ran ‘The Sunday Series’.

“When I left RTÉ in 1989 I started up my own company, Crescendo Concepts, to make documentaries. ‘Dear Daughter’ is the one that stands out because of its subject matter and because it broke the industrial school abuse story. It took a colossal amount of guts for Christine Buckley to go on screen and tell her story, and the same applies to all the other women who joined her in that film. As we were making the film we knew we had something that was going to stir things up. To what extent, we didn’t know, but it was amazing what effect it had. I think it was the catalyst for anything that came after that, like ‘States of Fear’.

“Another one I liked was ‘No More Blooms’, which was about the attitude of the Irish government to the Jews during and preceding the Second World War when it denied entrance to an awful lot of people. There was no humanity involved in the decisions they took. The total entry was about 60 people.

“RTÉ drama has just faded into nothing. Apart from ‘Fair City’ there is very little. I dislike intensely what I see now; not only on RTÉ but on BBC and the other English channels. Usually the storyline doesn’t have themes, there’s far too much violence and the subjects are dealt with in such a sensationalised fashion. It’s all gloss. There are exceptions – there was a wonderful series by Lenny Abrahamson a few years ago called ‘Prosperity’. That was compelling viewing.”

Louis Lentin was in conversation with Jan Battles.

The Right to Education (RTE) Act, 2009 empowers children belonging to the backward section of the economy to free and compulsory education. The Right to Education Act was earlier termed as The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act came into function after Gopal Krishna Gokhale’s famous impassionate plea to the Imperial Legislative Council for introducing free and compulsory primary education throughout India. The Right to Education Act made compulsory all government and private sector schools across India to provide 25 percent reservation to children between the age group of 6 and 14 belonging to the weaker section of the country access to free and compulsory education. India became one of the 135 countries to make education a fundamental right of every child, when the act finally came into practice in April 2010.

 

History

A rough version of the draft was first prepared in the year 2005. It was met with a lot of criticism because of the large percentage of reservation made mandatory across all schools for the unprivileged children. However, the Central Advisory Board of Education, who were founders of the draft stood ground and justified the 25percent reservation as a definite requisite to become a democratic and egalitarian society.

 

Time frame:

    Bill approved by the cabinet on 2 July, 2009
    Bill passed by the Rajya Sabha on 20 July, 2009
    Bill passed by the Lok Sabha on 4 August, 2009
    Received Presidential approval and made into a law on 26 August, 2009
    The law came to effect on 1 April, 2010, (except for the state of J&K), by Prime Minister, Dr. Manmohan Singh

 

Milestone

The Right to education Act is a fundamental right which allows every child between the age group of 6 to 14 to have access to free and fare education. It requires all private and government schools to reserve 25 percent of the seats for children belonging to weaker sections of the society. The act also separates the fraudulent schools and donations and concessions have been rolled back. The act also states that no child shall be expelled, held back or required to pass a board examination until the completion of elementary education. There is also a special training of school drop-outs to bring them up at par with students of the same age.


The Right to Education act stretches to 18 years of coverage for children with disabilities, and other provisions covered in the act range from infrastructure development, teacher-student ratio and faculty are mentioned in the act. The National Commission for Protection of Child Rights is an autonomous body set up to monitor the implementation of the act along with commissions set up by the States. The body in question was formed in the year 2007

 

Implementation & Funding

The Right to Education act has clearly laid down distinct responsibilities for the centre, state and local bodies for its implementation. However, a lot of states have been complaining about the lack of funds being received which is making it impossible to meet with the appropriate standard of education in the schools needed for universal education. Hence, the centre that is at the receiving end of the revenue will have to subsidize for the states.


A committee set up to study the fund requirement for the implementation of the act estimated an initial capital requirement of approximately Rs. 171000 crores or 1.71 trillion over 5 years, and in April 2010 the Indian government agreed to share the funding of the price at a ratio of 65 to 35 between the centre and the state and a ratio of 90 to 10 for the Northeastern states. Later the principal amount was then increased to Rs. 231000 crores and the centre agreed to raise its share to 68%. However there is much debate on this. Another important development in 2011 was to further stretch the act and implement it till the preschool age range, hence the age ceiling would rise from 14 years now to 16 years and would cover till class 10. . However this is under talks.


Anniversary

On completion of one year a report was released by the Human Resource Development ministry, which did not reflect happy numbers. The report admits that 8.1 million children in the age group of 4 to 16 remained out of school; there is a shortage of over 508000 teachers’ country wide. And there were several key legal commitments that were falling out of schedule. The Supreme Court of India also intervened to see the just implementation of the Right to Education Act in the Northeast States.


Criticism

The Right to education act has met with a lot of criticism such as being called a draft that was hastily prepared, there was not much consultation made on the quality of education, on excluding children under the 6 year age range. Many of the schemes have been compared to that of the Sarva Sikhsha Abhivan and DPEP of the 90’s which was criticized for being ineffective and corrupted. The  Right to Education Act also seems to have left out the orphans, since during the time of admission a lot of documents are required, like that of birth certificate, BPL certificates and the orphans deprived of such documents  are not eligible to apply.

0 thoughts on “Essay On Rte

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *